Financial Distress, Regional Independence and Corruption: An Empirical Study in Indonesian Local Governments

  • Evi Maria Universitas Kristen Satya Wacana
  • Abdul Halim Universitas Gadjah Mada
  • Eko Suwardi Universitas Gadjah Mada
Keywords: financial distress, regional independence, corruption, local governments

Abstract

This study aims to determine the effect of financial distress and regional independence on the probability of corruption in the local governments, Indonesia. This study used panel data of local governments in Indonesia in 2012 and 2013 with a total of 785 local governments. Data were analyzed using logistic regression analysis. The study results found that financial distress had no effect on the probability of corruption, while regional independence had a positive effect on the probability of corruption in the local governments, Indonesia. This means that if the regional independence is high then the probability of corruption in the local government is also high, vice versa. The study findings were also robust in a separated analysis, when additional test was carried out. This study found empirical evidence that the independence of funding sources, independence ratios to meet regional needs, and the amount of regional income could be used to detect corruption in local governments, Indonesia, while the budget solvency ratio, financial performance ratio of budget, financial performance ratio of fund equity and regional financial efficiency could not.

References

Abdullah, S. (2012). Perilaku Oportunistik Legislatif dan Faktor-Faktor yang mempengaruhinya: Bukti Empiris dari Penganggaran Pemerintah Daerah di Indonesia. Universitas Gadjah Mada.

Albrecht, W. S., Albrecht, C. C., & Albrecht, C. O. (2004). Fraud and Corporate Executives: Agency, Stewardship and Broken Trust. Journal of Forensic Accounting, 5, 109–130.

Allison, G. T. (2004). Public and Private Management: Are They Fundamentally Alike in All Unimportant Respects. In Classics of Public Administration. Wadsworth/Thomson Learning.

Arifin, T., Trinugroho, I., Prabowo, M. A., Sutaryo, S., & Muhtar, M. (2015). Local Governance and Corruption: Evidence from Indonesia. Corporate Ownership and Control, 12(4), 194–199.

Atmaja, F. K. (2012). Analisis Rasio Keuangan untuk Memprediksi Kemungkinan Financial Distress. Accounting Analysis Journal, 1(2), 1–7.

Beasley, M. S., Carcello, J. V., & Hermanson, D. R. (1999). Fraudulent Financial Reporting: 1987-1997 An Analysis of U. S. Public Companies. Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission.

Beasley, Mark S. (1996). Empirical Analysis the of Board the Relation of Financial Between Composition Statement Fraud. The Accounting Review, 71(4), 443–465. https://doi.org/https://www.jstor.org/stable/248566

Bonner, S. E., Palmrose, Z.-V., & Young, S. M. (1998). Fraud Type and Auditor Litigation: An Analysis of SEC Accounting and Auditing Enforcement Releases. The Accounting Review, 73(4), 503–532.

Chang, C., & Geoffrey, T. K. (2002). Bureaucratic Behavior in the Local Public Sector: A Revealed Preference Approach. Public Choice, 113(1), 191–210.

CICA. (1997). Indicators of Government Financial Condition. Canadian Institute of Chartered Accountants.

Cohen, S., Doumpos, M., Neofytou, E., & Zopounidis, C. (2012). Assessing Financial Distress where Bankruptcy is Not an Option: an Alternative Approach for Local Municipalities. European Journal of Operational Research, 218(1), 270–279.

Corruption Perceptions Index 2016. (2017). Transparency-International.

Cressey, D. R. (1953). Other People’s Money: A Study in the Social Psychology of Embezzlement. Free Press.

Dellaportas, S. (2013). Conversations with inmate accountants: Motivation, opportunity, and the fraud triangle. Accounting Forum, 37(1), 29–39. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.accfor.2012.09.003

Dorminey, J., Fleming, A., Kranacher, M., & Riley, R. (2010). Beyond The Fraud Triangle. The CPA Journal, 80(7), 17–23.

Dorn, N. (2010). The governance of securities Ponzi finance, regulatory convergence, credit crunch. British Journal of Criminology, 50(1), 23–45. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjc/azp062

Ganie-Rochman, M., & Achwan, R. (2016). Corruption in Indonesia’s Emerging Democracy. Journal of Developing Societies, 32(2), 159–177.

Goddard, A. (2005). Accounting and NPM in UK Local Government - Contributions Towards Governance and Accountability. Financial Accountability and Management, 21(2), 191–218. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0408.2005.00215.x

Gosling, J. J. (2015). Budgetary Politics in American Governments (6th ed.). Routledge.

Gudono. (2012). Analisis Data Multivariat (2nd ed.). BPFE.

Gudono. (2017). Teori Organisasi (4th ed.). Andy Offset.

Hair, J., Black, W., Babin, B., & R. Anderson. (2011). Multivariate Data Analysis: A Global Perspective (7th ed.). Pearson Education Limited.

Hartono, Mahmud, & Utaminingsih. (2014). Faktor-Faktor yang mempengaruhi Kelemahan Pengendalian Internal Pemerintah Daerah. Simposium Nasional Akuntansi XVII.

Heald, D. (2005). The implementation of resource accounting in the UK central government. Financial Accountability and Management, 21(2), 163–189. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0408.2005.00214.x

Isaksen, J. (2005). The Budget Process and Corruption. U4 Anti- Corruption Resource Centre (Working Paper No. U4 ISSUE 3:2005).

Jacobs, K. (2005). Hybridization or Polarisation: Doctors and Accounting in the UK, Germany, and Italy. Financial Accountability & Management, 21(May), 135–162. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0408.2005.00213.x

Jones, S., & Walker, R. G. (2007). Explanators of Local Government Distress. ABACUS, 43(3), 396–418.

Kloha, P., Weissert, C. S., & Kleine, R. (2005). Developing and Testing a Composite Model to Predict Local Fiscal Distress. American Society for Public Administration, 65(3), 313–323.

Komisi Pemberantasan Korupsi. (2019). Statistik Penindakan Tindak Pidana Korupsi Berdasarkan Profesi dan Jabatan. https://www.kpk.go.id/id/statistik/penindakan/tpk-berdasarkan-profesi-jabatan

Lou, Y., & Wang, M. (2009). Fraud Risk Factor Of The Fraud Triangle Assessing The Likelihood Of Fraudulent Financial Reporting. Journal of Business & Economics Research, 7(2), 61–78. https://doi.org/10.19030/jber.v7i2.2262

Maria, E., & Gudono. (2017). An empirical test of fraud triangle theory on local government (evidence from Indonesia). International Journal of Applied Business and Economic Research, 15(4), 233–248.

Maria, Evi, & Halim, A. (2020). Implementasi Kebijakan Desentralisasi dan Korupsi Kepala Daerah di Indonesia. In Harnovinsah, A. Sopanah, & R. P. Sari (Eds.), Bunga Rampai Akuntansi Publik: Isu Kontemporer Akuntansi Publik (1st ed., pp. 21–37). Unitomo Press.

Maria, Evi, Halim, A., & Suwardi, E. (2018). Eksplorasi Faktor Tekanan untuk Melakukan Fraud di Pemerintah Daerah, Indonesia. Jurnal Akuntansi Publik, 1(1), 111–126. https://doi.org/10.32554/jap.v1.i1.p111-126

Maria, Evi, Halim, A., Suwardi, E., & Miharjo, S. (2019a). Desentralisasi fiskal dan probabilitas terjadinya korupsi: Sebuah bukti empiris dari Indonesia. Jurnal Ekonomi Dan Bisnis, 22(1), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.24914/jeb.v22i1.2036

Maria, Evi, Halim, A., Suwardi, E., & Miharjo, S. (2019b). Eksplorasi Kesempatan Untuk Melakukan Fraud Di Pemerintah Daerah, Indonesia (Exploration Opportunities To Commit Fraud in Local Governments, Indonesia). Jurnal Akuntansi Dan Keuangan Indonesia, 16(1), 216–232.

McConnell, M. M., Mosser, P. C., & Perez-Quiros, G. (1999). A Decomposition of the Increased Stability GDP Growth. Current Issues in Economics and Finance, 5(13), 1–6.

Muhtar, Sutaryo, & Sriyanto. (2018). Corruption in Indonesian Local Government: Study on Triangle Fraud Theory. International Journal of Business Society, 19(2), 536–552.

Murdock, H. (2008). The Three Dimensions of Fraud: Auditors Should Understand the Needs, Opportunities, and Justifications that Lead Individuals to Commit Fraudulent Acts. The Internal Auditor, 65(1), 81–83.

O’Reilly, V. M., McDonnell, P. J., Winograd, B. N., Gerson, J. S., Jaenicke, H. R., & Montgomery’s., E. (1998). Auditing (12th edition). John Wiley & Sons.

Perwita Sari, R., Tjahjono, H., Nasional Veteran Jawa Timur, P., Rungkut Madya, R., & Timur, J. (2018). Analysis of Financial Performance In Public Sector (A Case Study in Lamongan, East Java-Indonesia). JASF Journal of Accounting and Strategic Finance, 1(1), 82–90. https://doi.org/10.33005/jasf.v1i01.35

Pfeffer, J., & Salancik, G. R. (1978). The External Control of Organizations: A Resource Dependence Perspective. Harper and Row.

Power, M. (2013). The apparatus of fraud risk. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 38(6–7), 525–543. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aos.2012.07.004

Puspitasari, N., & Suwardi, E. (2016). The Effect of Individual Morality and Internal Control on the Propensity to Commit Fraud: Evidence from Local Government. Journal of Indonesian Economy and Business, 32(2), 208–219.

Ramamoorti, S. (2008). The Psychology and Sociology of Fraud: Integrating the Behavioral Sciences Component Into Fraud and Forensic Accounting Curricula. Issues in Accounting Education, 23(4), 521–533.

Ritonga, I. (2014). Analisis Laporan Keuangan Pemda. Lembaga Kajian Manajemen Pemerintah Daerah, Pustaka Pelajar.

Ritonga, I. T., Clark, C., & Wickremasinghe, G. (2012). Assessing Financial Condition of Local Government in Indonesia : an Exploration. Public and Municipal Finance, 1(2), 37–50.

Rodrik, D. (2000). Participatory Politics, Social Cooperation, and Economic Stability. The American Economic Review, 90(2), 140–144.

Setyaningrum, D., & Safitri. F. (2012). Analisis Pengaruh Karakteristik Pemerintah Daerah terhadap Tingkat Pengungkapan Laporan Keuangan. Jurnal Akuntansi Dan Keuangan Indonesia, 9(2), 154–170.

Shafritz, J. M., Ott, S. J., & Jang, Y. S. (2011). Classics of Organization Theory (7th ed.). Wadsworth Cengage Learning.

Sikka, P. (2010). Financial Crisis and the Silence of the Auditors. Accounting Organizations and Society, 34(6–7), 868–873.

Sikka, P., & Hampton, M. (2005). The Role of Accountancy Firms in Tax Avoidance: Some Evidence and Issues. Accounting Forum, 29(3), 325–343.

Skousen, C. J., Smith, K. R., & Wright, C. J. (2009). Detecting and Predicting Financial Statement Fraud: The Effectiveness of The Fraud Triangle and SAS No. 99 in Corporate Governance and Firm Performance. In International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management (Vol. 32, Issue 3). https://doi.org/10.1108/S1569-3732(2011)0000014001

Stalebrink, O. J., & Sacco, J. F. (2007). Rationalization of financial statement fraud in government : An Austrian perspective. 18, 489–507. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpa.2006.01.009

Sutaryo., Sutopo., B., & Setyawan, D. (2010). Nilai Relevan Informasi Laporan Keuangan terkait Financial Distress Pemerintah Daerah. Simposium Nasional Akuntansi XIII.

Suyanto. (2009). Evidence from Statement on Auditing Standard No. 99. Gadjah Mada International Journal of Business, 11(1), 117–144.

Syurmita. (2014). Pengaruh Karakteristik Pemerintah Daerah terhadap Prediksi Financial Distress. Konfrensi Regional Akuntansi, 1–28.

Trend Corruption Case Handling 2017. (2017). Indonesian Corruption Watch.

Tuanakotta, T. M. (2016). Akuntansi Forensik & Audit Investigasi-Edisi 2 (2nd ed.). Salemba Empat.

Wu, X. (2005). Corporate Governance and Corruption: Governance: An International. An International Journal of Policy, Administration, and Institutions, 18(2), 151–170. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0491.2005.00271.x
Published
2021-06-05
How to Cite
Maria, E., Halim, A., & Suwardi, E. (2021, June 5). Financial Distress, Regional Independence and Corruption: An Empirical Study in Indonesian Local Governments. Journal of Accounting and Strategic Finance, 4(1), 54-70. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.33005/jasf.v4i1.159