The Role of Prudence in Moderating the Effect of Bonus Mechanism, Intangible Assets, and Inventory Intensity Ratio on Transfer Pricing

Authors

  • Uswatun Khasanah Universitas Negeri Semarang
  • Trisni Suryarini Universitas Negeri Semarang

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.33005/jasf.v3i2.89

Keywords:

Bonus Mechanism, Intangible Asset, Inventory Intensity Ratio, Prudence

Abstract

This study aims to examine prudence's role in moderating the effect of bonus mechanism, intangible asset, and inventory intensity ratio on transfer pricing decisions. This research population is all property, real estate & construction companies, and manufacturing companies listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange in 2018. The sampling technique uses a purposive sampling method to obtain 109 units of analysis. This study uses moderated regression analysis (MRA), which is processed using IBM SPSS 21. This study proves that the bonus mechanism does not affect, while intangible assets and inventory intensity ratio significantly affect transfer pricing decisions. Prudence is proven to moderate the intangible assets' influence but does not moderate the impact of the bonus mechanism and inventory intensity ratio on transfer pricing decisions. This study concludes that the bonus mechanism does not affect the transfer pricing decision. Prudence is proven to moderate the effect of intangible assets but does not moderate the impact of the bonus mechanism and inventory intensity ratio on transfer pricing decisions.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Downloads

Published

2020-11-30

How to Cite

Khasanah, U. ., & Suryarini, T. . (2020). The Role of Prudence in Moderating the Effect of Bonus Mechanism, Intangible Assets, and Inventory Intensity Ratio on Transfer Pricing. JASF: Journal of Accounting and Strategic Finance, 3(2), 154–168. https://doi.org/10.33005/jasf.v3i2.89