When Good Governance Matters: Digital Auditing and Public Sector Audit Quality
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.33005/jasf.v9i1.738Keywords:
CAATs, remote auditing, professional scepticism, good governance, audit quality, public sector auditAbstract
Purpose: This study aims to examine the effects of Computer-Assisted Audit Techniques (CAATs), remote auditing, and professional scepticism on the quality of public sector audits, and to analyse the role of good governance moderation in these relationships. This study is important because digital-based public sector audits require governance support to enable technology and auditor judgment to improve public accountability.
Method: This study uses a quantitative approach with auditors of the Supreme Audit Agency (BPK) in Central Java as respondents. The Sample used was 134 respondents. Data were obtained by distributing questionnaires. Data were collected through surveys and analysed using Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modelling (PLS-SEM) with SmartPLS 4.0.
Findings: The results indicate that remote auditing has a positive effect on the quality of public sector audits. In contrast, CAATs and professional scepticism had no direct effect. However, good governance has been shown to moderate the influence of CAATs, remote auditing, and professional scepticism on audit Quality. These findings suggest that audit technology and auditors' critical attitude do not work automatically but require strong governance support.
Implications: The results of this study affirm the importance of strengthening digital audit governance, data Quality, Information System Integration, digital Evidence security, auditor independence, and follow-up of audit results. BPK needs to build a digital audit ecosystem that is not only focused on technology adoption but also on strengthening accountability and internal controls.
Novelty/Value: This study demonstrates that good governance is a key condition for the effectiveness of audit technology and for professional scepticism in improving the quality of public sector audits.
Downloads
References
Abu Huson, Y., Sierra-García, L., & García-Benau, M. A. (2024). A bibliometric review of information technology, artificial intelligence, and blockchain on auditing. Total Quality Management and Business Excellence, 35(1–2), 91–113. https://doi.org/10.1080/14783363.2023.2256260
Adeniyi, S. I. & Aderobaki, V. A. (2023). Board Diversity and Audit Quality among Selected Listed Food and Beverage Firms on the Nigeria Exchange Group. JASF: Journal of Accounting and Strategic Finance, 5(2), 316–330. https://doi.org/10.33005/jasf.v5i2.259
Ahmed, N., & Senan, M. (2024). Uncertain Supply Chain Management Influential factors shaping the adoption and utilization of audit technology (CAATS) in the audit practices in Saudi Arabia: Human capital expertise as a moderating factor. USCM, 12, 2607–2618. https://doi.org/10.5267/j.uscm.2024.5.009
Ahmed, S. K. (2024). How to choose a sampling technique and determine sample size for research: A simplified guide for researchers. Oral Oncology Reports, 12, 100662. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oor.2024.100662
Al-Araj, R. (2025). Analyzing the influence of TOE factors on e-auditing adoption in audit firms: The moderating effect of trust. Decision Science Letters, 14(3), 611–622. https://doi.org/10.5267/j.dsl.2025.4.005
Al-Hajaya, K., Alma’aitah, R. T., Salem, R. I. A., & Hutaibat, K. (2025). Understanding challenges of conventional remote auditing and AI-enabled remote IT auditing: Audit professionals’ perspectives from an emerging economy. Journal of Accounting & Organizational Change. https://doi.org/10.1108/JAOC-12-2024-0395
Al Shbail, M. O., Jaradat, Z., Al-Hawamleh, A., Hamdan, A., & Musleh Alsartawi, A. M. A. (2025). Enhancing audit quality in non-Big 4 firms: The role of remote auditing and audit staff capabilities. Journal of Financial Reporting and Accounting, 23(2), 700–720. https://doi.org/10.1108/JFRA-11-2023-0653
Alhebri, A. (2025). The moderating effect of the effectiveness of the internal audit function on the relationship between CAATS and corporate governance and the quality of financial reports in commercial banks : Evidence from the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. DSL, 14, 213–224. https://doi.org/10.5267/j.dsl.2024.9.005
Alma’aitah, R. T., Al-Hajaya, K., Sawan, N., & Alzeban, A. (2024). The impact of remote auditing on audit quality: The moderating role of technology readiness. Managerial Auditing Journal, 39(6), 624–647. https://doi.org/10.1108/MAJ-02-2024-4210
Alqudah, H., Amran, N. A., Hassan, H., Lutfi, A., Alessa, N., Alrawad, M., & Almaiah, M. A. (2023). Examining the critical factors of internal audit effectiveness from internal auditors’ perspective: Moderating role of extrinsic rewards. Heliyon, 9(10), e20497. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e20497
Alsarayrah, T., & Ali, B. J. A. (2025). The Moderating Role of Auditor Experience on Determinants of Computer-Assisted Auditing Tools and Techniques. 1–14.
Amadu, M., Tetteh, L. A., Krah, R., Agyenim-Boateng, C., & Amo, H. F. (2025). Determinants of adoption of computer-assisted audit tools and techniques among internal audit units: the moderating role of organisational culture. VINE Journal of Information and Knowledge Management Systems. https://doi.org/10.1108/VJIKMS-03-2025-0097
Anand, V., Vishnu, R. S., Nair, G. V, & Priyanka, K. (2024). A Study on the Perceptions and Factors Influencing the Current Utilisation of Technology-Based Audit Techniques (TBAT). Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems, 1163, 213–220. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-97-8537-7_19
Argento, D., Dobija, D., Grossi, G., Marrone, M., & Mora, L. (2025). The unaccounted effects of digital transformation: implications for accounting, auditing and accountability research. Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal, 38(3), 765–796. https://doi.org/10.1108/AAAJ-01-2025-7670
Aslan, L. (2021). The evolving competencies of the public auditor and the future of public sector auditing. In Contemporary Studies in Economic and Financial Analysis (Vol. 105, pp. 113–129). https://doi.org/10.1108/S1569-375920200000105008
Bin-Nashwan, S. A., Li, J. Z., Jiang, H. C., Bajary, A. R., & Ma’aji, M. M. (2025). Does AI adoption redefine financial reporting accuracy, auditing efficiency, and information asymmetry? An integrated model of TOE-TAM-RDT and big data governance. Computers in Human Behavior Reports, 17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chbr.2024.100572
Bougie, R., & Sekaran, U. (2025). Research Methods for Business, with eBook Access Code: A Skill-Building Approach. John Wiley & Sons.
Ceki, B., & Moloi, T. (2025). Technology Adoption Framework for Supreme Audit Institutions Within the Hybrid TAM and TOE Model. Journal of Risk and Financial Management, 18(8). https://doi.org/10.3390/jrfm18080409
Chouaibi, S., & Fadhli, M. (2026). Corporate governance and integrated reporting quality: Does green innovation moderate the relationship? A G20 perspective. Managerial Finance, 52(2), 356–370. https://doi.org/10.1108/MF-11-2024-0858
DeAngelo, L. E. (1981). Auditor size and audit quality. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 3(3), 183–199. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/0165-4101(81)90002-1
Dekeyser, S., He, X., Xiao, T., & Zuo, L. (2024). Auditor industry range and audit quality. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 77(2), 101669. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacceco.2023.101669
Deligiannis, A. P., Mitropoulou, D., & Peristeras, V. (2026). Public Sector Innovation Capacity in Core Administrative Organizations: Evidence from Norway’s Brønnøysund Register Centre. 1–30.
Dragomir, V. D., & Dumitru, M. (2023). Does corporate governance improve integrated reporting quality? A meta-analytical investigation. Meditari Accountancy Research, 31(6). https://doi.org/10.1108/MEDAR-03-2022-1618
Drazin, R. (1991). The processes of technological innovation. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 16(1), 45–46. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02371446
Evinita, L. L., Kewo, C. L., & Kambey, J. P. (2025). Measuring the Factors Affecting the Quality of Public Sector Financial Reports to Improve Financial Accountability. Quality - Access to Success, 26(205), 409–416. https://doi.org/10.47750/QAS/26.205.41
Fang, Q., Wang, Z., & Dang, L. (2025). Audit effort in the digital Era: Uncovering the dynamic interplay of business strategy and digital transformation. International Journal of Accounting Information Systems, 56, 100747. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.accinf.2025.100747
Farida, A. L. & Sugesti, P. F. (2023). Determinant of Earnings Management: Financial Distress, Tax Planning, Audit Quality, and Public Accountant Firm Size. JASF: Journal of Accounting and Strategic Finance, 6(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.33005/jasf.v6i1.386
Grohnert, T., Gijselaers, W. H., Meuwissen, R. H. G., & Trotman, K. T. (2025). The effects of a supportive learning culture and rank on professional skepticism in information search. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 114, 101590. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aos.2025.101590
Grossi, G., Hay, D. C., Kuruppu, C., & Neely, D. (2023). Changing the boundaries of public sector auditing. Journal of Public Budgeting, Accounting & Financial Management, 35(4), 417–430. https://doi.org/10.1108/JPBAFM-05-2023-0079
Guo, R., Jia, Y., & Shentu, L. (2025). The effect of audit digital transformation on audit quality: Evidence from digital bank confirmations. China Journal of Accounting Studies, 13(3), 247–281. https://doi.org/10.1080/21697213.2024.2442769
Hair, J. F., Risher, J. J., Sarstedt, M., & Ringle, C. M. (2019). When to use and how to report the results of PLS-SEM. European Business Review, 31(1), 2–24. https://doi.org/10.1108/EBR-11-2018-0203
Hair, J. F., & Sabol, M. A. (2025). Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM): A Rapidly Emerging SEM Alternative BT - International Encyclopedia of Statistical Science (M. Lovric (ed.); pp. 1880–1882). Springer Berlin Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-69359-9_466
Hair Jr, J. F., Hult, G. T. M., Ringle, C. M., Sarstedt, M., Danks, N. P., & Ray, S. (2021). Partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM) using R: A workbook. Springer Nature.
Hilkenmeier, F., Bohndick, C., Bohndick, T., & Hilkenmeier, J. (2020). Assessing Distinctiveness in Multidimensional Instruments Without Access to Raw Data – A Manifest Fornell-Larcker Criterion. 11(March), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00223
Huang, L., Liu, D., Lehner, O. M., Ittonen, K., Silvola, H., Ström, E., Wührleitner, A., Seethamraju, R., Hecimovic, A., Leocádio, D., Malheiro, L., Reis, J., Anandarajan, M., Anandarajan, A., Bello y Villarino, J. M., Zhong, C., Goel, S., Noordin, N. A., Hussainey, K., … Ma’aji, M. M. (2024). The application of artificial intelligence in auditing: Looking back to the future. International Journal of Accounting Information Systems, 14(1), 5972–5980. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2024.3375763
Hurtt, R. K. (2010). Development of a Scale to Measure Professional Skepticism. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 29(1), 149–171. https://doi.org/10.2308/aud.2010.29.1.149
Ismail, S., Mokhtar, N., & Ahmad, H. (2024). Factors influencing readiness to implement digital audit among internal auditors of the Malaysian public sector. Accounting Research Journal, 37(5), 540–556. https://doi.org/10.1108/ARJ-01-2024-0033
Jannah, M., & Nirwana, H. (2025). Transparency and accountability in local government financial reporting: A systematic literature review. Social Sciences Insights Journal, 2687(Falk 2017), 78–86.
Jayanti, C., Slamet, C. A., & Handoko, B. L. (2025). The impact of CAATS on financial auditor task effectiveness, moderated by computer literacy. Multidisciplinary Science Journal.
Jensen, M. C., & Meckling, W. H. (1976). Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs, and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 3(4), 305–360. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-405X(76)90026-X
Johnsen, Å. (2019). Public sector audit in contemporary society: A short review and introduction. Financial Accountability and Management, 35(2), 121–127. https://doi.org/10.1111/faam.12191
Juneja, D., Jena, A., Gupta, M., & Sharman, R. (2025). Innovative Auditing Practices: Evidence From Emerging Technologies. In Advancing IT Audits Through Integrative Approaches and Emerging Technologies (pp. 131–169). https://doi.org/10.4018/979-8-3373-3078-5.ch005
Kante, M., & Michel, B. (2023). Use of partial least squares structural equation modelling (PLS-SEM) in privacy and disclosure research on social network sites: A systematic review. Computers in Human Behavior Reports, 10, 100291. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chbr.2023.100291
Kartika, D. & Pramuka, B. A. (2019). The Influence of Competency, Independency, and Professionalism on Audit Quality: (Empirical Study in Accounting Firms in Central Java). JASF: Journal of Accounting and Strategic Finance, 2(2), 157–169. https://doi.org/10.33005/jasf.v2i2.58
Kartikasary, M., Laurens, S., & Sitinjak, M. (2021). Factors affecting the use of generalized audit software in the audit process in Indonesia. Accounting, 7(4), 819–824. https://doi.org/10.5267/j.ac.2021.2.002
Leixnering, S., Höllerer, M. A., Polzer, T., & Schiffinger, M. (2025). The role of public auditing in delegated governance. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 49, 107281. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaccpubpol.2024.107281
Liu, Z., & Huang, Y. (2025). Skill is power: does the executive’s IT background affect the audit opinion? Managerial Auditing Journal. https://doi.org/10.1108/MAJ-02-2025-4690
Lugli, E., & Bertacchini, F. (2023). Audit quality and digitalization: Some insights from the Italian context. Meditari Accountancy Research, 31(4), 841–860. https://doi.org/10.1108/MEDAR-08-2021-1399
Magboul, I., Jebreel, M., Shawtri, F., Qabajeh, M., Shanti, A., Alqudah, M., & Abu Huson, Y. (2024). Factors influencing accounting information system usage by oil companies & performance outcomes. Cogent Business and Management, 11(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/23311975.2024.2369211
Magnusson, L., Iqbal, S., Elm, P., & Dalipi, F. (2025). Information security governance in the public sector: investigations, approaches, measures, and trends. International Journal of Information Security, 24(4), 177. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10207-025-01097-x
Mediawati, E., & Rasyid, S. (2024). New trends and directions in local government finance research: A bibliometric analysis. Public and Municipal Finance, 13(1), 137–149. https://doi.org/10.21511/pmf.13(1).2024.11
Meiryani, M., Oktavianie, H., & Teresa, V. (2022). Understanding Determinants of Computer-Assisted Audit Techniques (CAATs) Adoption Intention Among Auditors in Indonesia. ACM International Conference Proceeding Series, 117–124. https://doi.org/10.1145/3545897.3545915
Nadirsyah, Indriani, M., & Mulyany, R. (2024). Enhancing fraud prevention and internal control: the key role of internal audit in public sector governance. Cogent Business & Management, 11(1), 2382389. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311975.2024.2382389
Nelson, M. W. (2009). A Model and Literature Review of Professional Skepticism in Auditing. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 28(2), 1–34. https://doi.org/10.2308/aud.2009.28.2.1
Omari, H. M. A. Al, Kadir, M. R. A. K., Sapingi, R. B., & Al-Dalaien, A. (2025). The Impact of Top Management Support on Computer-Assisted Audit Tools ( CAATs ) Adoption : Mediating Effects of Auditor IT Competency and Innovativeness with a Focus on Perceived Usefulness. WSEAS Transactions on Business and Economics, 22, 220–233. https://doi.org/10.37394/23207.2025.22.22
Otenyo, E. E. (2022). Contingency Theory of Organizations BT - Global Encyclopedia of Public Administration, Public Policy, and Governance (A. Farazmand (ed.); pp. 2469–2473). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-66252-3_58
Otley, D. T. (1980). The contingency theory of management accounting: Achievement and prognosis. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 5(4), 413–428. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/0361-3682(80)90040-9
Pandey, P., & Pandey, M. M. (2021). Research methodology tools and techniques. Bridge Center.
Post, T. J. (2024). Ex-BPK official gets 2.5 years in prison after returning bribes. The Jakarta Post. https://www.thejakartapost.com/indonesia/2024/06/23/ex-bpk-official-gets-2-5-years-in-prison-after-returning-bribes.html
Purnamasari, R., Hasanudin, A. I., Zulfikar, R., & Yazid, H. (2024). Do internal control and information systems drive sustainable rural development in Indonesia? Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity, 10(1), 100242. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joitmc.2024.100242
Puthukulam, G., Ravikumar, A., Sharma, R. V. K., & Meesaala, K. M. (2021b). Auditors’ perception of the impact of artificial intelligence on professional skepticism and judgment in Oman. Universal Journal of Accounting and Finance, 9(5), 1184–1190. https://doi.org/10.13189/ujaf.2021.090527
Rafiuddin, M., Putri, F. A. N., Chen, Y., & Haryono, S. (2024). Sustainability Performance and Companies' Financing: Does Audit Quality Matter? JASF: Journal of Accounting and Strategic Finance, 7(2), 352–361. https://doi.org/10.33005/jasf.v7i2.514
Rahim, S., Ahmad, H., Widya, A., Wahyuni, N., & Junaidi, J. (2023). Auditors’ Experience in Financial Statement Fraud Detection: The Role of Professional Scepticism and Idealism. Management and Accounting Review, 22(3), 201–222. https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85180463642&partnerID=40&md5=8d0baafd06caf7decde594d7ec2a5154
Rana, T. (2018). New public management reforms and modernization changes in Australia. In Handbook of Research on Modernization and Accountability in Public Sector Management (pp. 1–17). https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-5225-3731-1.ch001
Rikhardsson, P., Thórisson, K. R., Bergthorsson, G., & Batt, C. (2022). Artificial intelligence and auditing in small- and medium-sized firms: Expectations and applications. AI Magazine, 43(3), 323–336. https://doi.org/10.1002/aaai.12066
Saleh, R., Winarningsih, S., Suharman, H., Setiawan, M., Winarningsih, S., & Suharman, H. (2026). The role of internal audit in public procurement governance : a systematic literature review. Cogent Business & Management, 13(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/23311975.2026.2640253
Samagaio, A., & Felício, T. (2022). The influence of the auditor’s personality in audit quality. Journal of Business Research, 141, 794–807. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.11.082
Sarker, M., & AL-Muaalemi, M. A. (2022). Sampling Techniques for Quantitative Research BT - Principles of Social Research Methodology (M. R. Islam, N. A. Khan, & R. Baikady (eds.); pp. 221–234). Springer Nature Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-5441-2_15
Sawaya, C., Khalil, F. C., Jabbour Al Maalouf, N., & Kaspard, J. (2026). Revolutionizing audit practice in emerging economies: the role of Artificial Intelligence in enhancing the audit of consolidated financial statements. Cogent Business and Management, 13(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/23311975.2026.2625974
Seethamraju, R., & Hecimovic, A. (2023). Adoption of artificial intelligence in auditing: An exploratory study. Australian Journal of Management, 48(4), 780–800. https://doi.org/10.1177/03128962221108440
Senan, N. A. M. (2024). The Moderating Role of Corporate Governance on the Associations of Internal Audit and Its Quality with the Financial Reporting Quality: The Case of Yemeni Banks. Journal of Risk and Financial Management, 17(3). https://doi.org/10.3390/jrfm17030124
Seshadrinathan, S., & Chandra, S. (2025). Trusting the trustless blockchain for its adoption in accounting: Theorizing the mediating role of the technology-organization-environment framework. Financial Innovation, 11(1), 44. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40854-024-00685-5
Setyawan, E., Nurnaningsih, R., Ningsih, T. W., Suryaningrum, D.H., & Awaludin, D. T. (2026). The Effect of Audit Tenure, Auditor Switching on Audit Quality in Non-Financial Companies. Indonesian Journal of Economic Review (IJER), 6(2), 533–539. https://doi.org/10.59431/ijer.v6i2.802
Setyarto, D. B., & Judijanto, L. (2025). The role of e-government in increasing transparency and accountability of public administration in the digital era. Edelweiss Applied Science and Technology, 9(2), 1771–1783. https://doi.org/10.55214/25768484.v9i2.4908
Shen, H., Pan, J., Monroe, G., You, J., & Wu, H. (2026). Audit firm informatization and audit quality during COVID-19. Journal of Accounting Literature, 48(3), 956–981. https://doi.org/10.1108/JAL-06-2023-0094
Shonhadji, N., & Maulidi, A. (2020). Is it suitable for your local governments? A contingency theory-based analysis on the use of internal control in thwarting white-collar crime. Journal of Financial Crime, 29(2), 770–786. https://doi.org/10.1108/JFC-10-2019-0128
Siew, E.-G., Rosli, K., & Yeow, P. H. P. (2020). Organizational and environmental influences in the adoption of computer-assisted audit tools and techniques (CAATTs) by audit firms in Malaysia. International Journal of Accounting Information Systems, 36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.accinf.2019.100445
Siew, E. G., Rosli, K., & Yeow, P. H. P. (2020). Organizational and environmental influences in the adoption of computer-assisted audit tools and techniques (CAATTs) by audit firms in Malaysia. International Journal of Accounting Information Systems, 36(xxxx), 100445. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.accinf.2019.100445
Soedarsono, S., Mulyani, S., Tugiman, H., & Suhardi, D. (2019). Information quality and management support as key factors in the applications of continuous auditing and continuous monitoring: An empirical study in the government sector of Indonesia. Contemporary Economics, 13(3), 335–350. https://doi.org/10.5709/ce.1897-9254.317
Sujanto, M., Lindawati, A. S. L., Zulkarnain, A., & Liawatimena, S. (2021). Auditor’s Perception on Technology Transformation: Blockchain and CAATs on Audit Quality in Indonesia. 12(8), 526–533.
Susan, E. B., & Pan, Y. (2024). Trust as a determinant of green finance through information sharing and technological penetration: Integrating the moderation of governance for sustainable growth. Technology in Society, 77. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2024.102565
Suryaningrum, D.H., Subroto, B., Sutrisno, T., and Aulia, R. (2015). Empirical Analysis of Ethics Integration and Online Learning in Auditing Course on Ethical Decision Making: Further Evidence from Indonesia (March 2, 2015). Journal of Advanced Research in Business, Management, and Accounting, Volume-1, Issue-1, March 2015, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3031194
Tetteh, L. A., Simpson, S. N. Y., Nyabey, E. P., Kubaje, T. A., Togormey, R., & Tagoe, F. (2026). Utilising the technology-organisation-environment framework in understanding the adoption and usage of computer-assisted audit tools and techniques: A qualitative insight. VINE Journal of Information and Knowledge Management Systems, 56(1), 19–41. https://doi.org/10.1108/VJIKMS-01-2024-0015
Tornatzky, L. G., & Fleischer, M. (1990). The Processes of Technological Innovation. Lexington Books.
Torroba, M., Sánchez, J. R., López, L., & Callejón, Á. (2025). Investigating the impacting factors for the audit professionals to adopt data analysis and artificial intelligence: Empirical evidence for Spain. International Journal of Accounting Information Systems, 56(July 2023). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.accinf.2025.100738
Trudelle, A. M. (2024). Review of International Political Economy Tools of regime stability : the political economy of sovereign wealth funds in Gulf rentier states. Review of International Political Economy, 31(5), 1446–1471. https://doi.org/10.1080/09692290.2024.2325394
Vaithilingam, S., Ong, C. S., Moisescu, O. I., & Nair, M. S. (2024). Robustness checks in PLS-SEM: A review of recent practices and recommendations for future applications in business research. Journal of Business Research, 173, 114465. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2023.114465
Vokshi, B., & Xhemajli, A. (2022). Internal Audit in The Public Sector in Kosovo: Promoting Good Governance and Improving Performance. Quality - Access to Success, 23(189), 160–164. https://doi.org/10.47750/QAS/23.189.18
Wassie, F. A. (2024). Leveraging computer-assisted audit tools for corporate sustainability: Evidence from Ethiopia. Journal of Infrastructure, Policy and Development, 8(1), 1–26. https://doi.org/10.24294/jipd.v8i1.2690
Wassie, F. A., & Lakatos, L. P. (2025). Audit technology as a catalyst for improving non-financial performance in Ethiopian audit firms. Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity, 11(2), 100556. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joitmc.2025.100556
Wassie, F. A., & Peter, L. L. (2024). Technology adoption in audit of information systems: Ethiopian audit firms’ perspective. Journal of Infrastructure, Policy and Development, 8(13), 1–23. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.24294/jipd8819
Yamen, A., & Can, G. (2023). The impact of public governance perception on the quality of financial reporting. Economic Research-Ekonomska Istraživanja, 36(3), 2223264. https://doi.org/10.1080/1331677X.2023.2223264
Yang, J., Blount, Y., & Amrollahi, A. (2024). Artificial intelligence adoption in a professional service industry: A multiple case study. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 201. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2024.123251
Zygoulis, F. (2014). Artificial Intelligence and the Future of the Internal Audit Function: A Systematic Literature Review. SSRN, 1–89. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4927352
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Edy Supriyono, Yussri Sawani, Enny Susilowati Mardjono, Simon Nisja Putra Zai, Vicky Pratama Mahardika

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.









