The Compliance of Motor Vehicle Taxpayers: An Experimental Research
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.33005/jasf.v1i2.44Keywords:
Trust, government authority, tax sanction, tax complianceAbstract
This study aims to analyze the influence of motor vehicle taxpayers' trust in government authority and tax sanctions on motor vehicle taxpayer compliance. This research is experimental research with 76 accounting student participants who are taking a Taxation course. The analysis method uses ANOVA analysis. The results of the study prove that the trustworthiness of taxpayers with government authorities influences the compliance of taxpayers in carrying out their tax obligations. Conversely, tax sanctions do not affect taxpayer compliance. This result proves that taxpayers will be more compliant with their tax obligations if the government performs its functions as a state apparatus properly. The government with competent authority means that there is clear accountability about the use of tax returns; it can encourage the level of tax compliance.
Downloads
References
Ariani, M., Defrianto, D., & Zulhawati Z. (2016). Pengaruh Sosialisasi, Sanksi, dan Kepercayaan terhadap Kepatuhan Wajib Pajak dalam Membayar Pajak Pph Pasal 21, Jurnal Riset Akuntansi & Perpajakan JRAP. Vol. 3 (2): Desember, 161-175.
Basri, Yesi Mutia. (2016), Kepercayaan dan Kekuasaan dalam Otoritas Pemerintah Sebagai Determinan Tingkat Kepatuhan Pajak dan Penggelapan Pajak: Pengujian Assumsi Kerangka Slippery Slope., https://www.academia.edu/6953234/KEPERCAYAAN_DAN_KEKUASAAN_DALAM_OTORITAS_PEMERINTAH_SEBAGAI_DETERMINAN_TINGKAT_KEPATUHAN_PAJAK_DAN_PENGGELAPAN_PAJAK_PENGUJIAN_ASSUMSI_KERANGKA_SLIPPERY_SLOPE, diakses 5 Mei 2018
Chau, G. & P. Leung, (2009). A critical review of Fischer tax compliance model: A research synthesis, Journal of Accounting and Taxation Vol. 1 (2), 34-40. http://www.academicjournals.org/app/webroot/article/article1379342283_Chau%20and%20Leung.pdf, diakses 30 Mei 2018.
Doran, Michael (2009). Tax Penalties and Tax Compliance, 46 Harv. J. on Legis.
Greenfield, Jr., A.C., C.S. Norman, & B. Wier, (2008). “The effect of ethical orientation and professional commitment on earning management behavior,” Journal of Business Ethics, 83, 419-434.
Jajeli, R., (2016). Hingga Agustus 2016, Tunggakan Pajak Kendaraan Bermotor di Jatim Rp 300 Miliar, https://news.detik.com/berita-jawa-timur/3289959/hingga-agustus-2016-tunggakan-pajak-kendaraan-bermotor-di-jatim-rp-300-miliar, diakses 30 Mei 2018.
Kalangi, Lintje. (2014). Pengaruh Tarif Pajak dan Probabilitas Audit terhadap Kepatuhan Pajak Penghasilan (Studi Eksperimen Laboratorium). Diakses 5 Mei 2018, http://download.portalgaruda.org/article.php?article=163621&val=1018&title=Pengaruh%20Tarif%20Pajak%20dan%20Probabilitas%20Audit%20terhadap%20Kepatuhan%20Pajak%20Penghasilan%20(Studi%20Eksperimen%20Laboratorium)
Kerlinger, F.N., (2006). Asas-asas Penelitian Behavioral, Edisi Ketiga, Gajah Mada University Press, Yogyakarta
Kirchler, E., Hoelzl, E., & Wahl, I. (2008). Enforced versus voluntary tax compliance. The Slippery Slope framework. Journal of Economic Psychology, 29; 210–225.
Kogler C, Batrancea L, Nichita A, Jozsef P d, Alexis B e, & Kirchler E. (2013). Trust and power as determinants of tax compliance: Testing the assumptions of the slippery slope framework in Austria, Hungary, Romania and Russia, Journal of Economic Psychology 34; 169–180
Mahadiyanto, M.Y., & Astuti, A.D., (2017). Previllage Tax Payer, Sosialisasi Pajak dan Kepercayaan pada Otoritas Pajak terhadap Kepatuhan, Jurnal Kajian Akuntansi Vol. 1 (1), 77-86.
Mardiasmo, (2011). Perpajakan. Edisi Revisi. Yogyakarta: CV. Andi Offset.
Mortensen, T., R. Fisher, & G. Wines, 2012. “Students as Surrogates for Practicing Accountants: Further Evidence,” Accounting Forum 36, p. 251-265.
Mulder, L. B., Van Dijk, E., De Cremer, D., & Wilke, H. A. M. (2016). Undermining trust and cooperation: The paradox of sanctioning systems in social dilemmas. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 42, 147–162
Republik Indonesia (RI), (2004). Undang-Undang nomor 33 tahuan 2004 tentang Perimbangan Keuangan antara Pemerintah Pusat dan Pemerintah Daerah. Lembaran negara republik indonesia tahun 2004 nomor 126.
Republika, (2017). Realisasi PKB dan BBNKB Jatim Capai Rp 9,011 Triliun, https://www.republika.co.id/berita/ekonomi/keuangan/17/02/26/olzk9x319-realisasi-pkb-dan-bbnkb-jatim-capai-rp-9011-triliun, diakses 30 Mei 2018.
Rusyadi M. Khoiru, (2009). Dampak Persepsi Tanggung Jawab Perusahaan Terhadap Manajemen Perpajakan (Tax Planning). Jurnal Akuntansi Dan Bisnis Vol. 9, No 1, Pebruari 2009, hlm. 61-70.
Samudra, A.A., (2015). Perpajakan di Indonesia. Jakarta: PT Raja Grafindo Persada
Sari, R.P., Tjahjono, H., & Turino, (2018). Analysis of Financial Performance in Public Sector, Journal of Accounting and Strategic Finance, 1 (01), 82-90. DOI:https://doi.org/10.33005/jasf.v1i01.35
Suryadi. (2006). Model Hubungan Kausal Kesadaran, Pelayanan, Kepatuhan Wajib Pajak dan Pengaruhnya terhadap Kinerja Penerimaan Pajak: Suatu Survey di Wilayah Jawa Timur. Jurnal Keuangan Publik. Vol 4, 105-121.
Utama, I.W.M., (2013). Pengaruh Kualitas Pelayanan, Sanksi Perpajakan, dan Biaya Kepatuhan terhadap Kepatuhan Wajib Pajak, E-Jurnal Akuntansi, Vol. 2 (2), 452-470. https://ojs.unud.ac.id/index.php/Akuntansi/article/view/4850, diakses 30 Mei 2018.
Wahl, I., Kastlunger, B., & Kirchler, E. (2010). Trust in authorities and power to enforce tax compliance. An empirical analysis of the Slippery Slope Framework. Law & Policy, 32, 383–406.










